Sons of God Are Not Angels

 The phrase “sons of God” has sparked debate for centuries—are they angels, men, or something else? Many interpretations have drifted into speculation, but Scripture itself provides clear answers. This page gathers studies that dig into the biblical text, with special attention to the Septuagint and the writings of the apostles, to show who the sons of God truly are according to the Word of God.

Articles:

The Bible Says Angels Were Never Called Sons of God




Videos:

























Popular posts from this blog

The History and Canonical Status of the Book of Enoch

 The Book of Enoch is an ancient text composed of multiple sections written by various authors between about 300 BC and 100 AD. While it claims to be written by Enoch, the seventh generation from Adam mentioned in Genesis, this claim is false, and scholars classify the work as pseudepigrapha—writings falsely attributed to biblical figures. Today, the oldest complete manuscripts of the Book of Enoch are preserved in the Ethiopian Ge’ez language, with surviving copies dating mostly from the 15th century onward. Ge’ez is a Semitic liturgical language used by the Ethiopian Orthodox Church and some Ethiopian Jewish communities. Earlier fragments and portions in Aramaic, Greek, and Latin have also been discovered, including Aramaic fragments among the Dead Sea Scrolls. These small fragments confirm much of the text's antiquity and suggest it was originally composed in Aramaic or possibly Greek before being translated into Ge’ez centuries later. Notably, the Book of Parables section (chap...
Read more

Should We Make a Big Deal About Enoch 1:9 in the Dead Sea Scrolls?

Image
  Supporters of the Book of Enoch often point to 1 Enoch 1:9 being discovered in the Dead Sea Scrolls, claiming this somehow proves the book’s authority—especially because of its similarity to Jude 14–15. But does the evidence really support that? The truth is, the fragment we have from Qumran (4Q204) is extremely small. Only a few words survive from the Aramaic text, and the rest has to be reconstructed by scholars. This means we cannot make exact comparisons or claim that Jude was quoting it word-for-word. In fact, differences are already noticeable: Jude speaks of the Lord coming to “convict” the ungodly, while Enoch 1:9 (in the forms we have) speaks of “destroying” them—a significant theological distinction. What the Dead Sea Scrolls actually show is simple: some Jewish communities in the Second Temple period were reading and preserving the Book of Enoch. That tells us the book was influential to certain groups, but it does not make it inspired. Many other non-biblical texts we...
Read more

The Absurd Giant Claims of the Book of Enoch

Image
Enoch Chapter 7:2  “And they [human women] became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells:” The Book of Enoch claims that the giants born from human women were “three thousand ells” tall. An ancient ell was about 18 inches (1.5 feet), meaning these giants would have been roughly 4,500 feet tall—nearly a mile high! To put this in perspective, Noah’s Ark was said to be 300 cubits long, about 450 feet. According to Enoch’s numbers, the giants were ten times longer than the Ark itself. This isn’t just exaggeration; it’s pure fantasy. Scripture mentions giants like King Og, whose bed was around 13.5 feet long, suggesting he was roughly 9 feet tall—giants, yes, but within humanly believable limits. At 4,500 feet, these Enoch giants would be taller than any mountain and utterly impossible biologically and physically. The Book of Enoch’s giants belong to the realm of myth, not reality. Its fantastical numbers reveal the text as bad fiction—sensational sto...
Read more